
Reuters has learned, the United States is considering the transfer of an unspecified number of Taliban prisoners from the Guantanamo Bay military prison into Afghan government custody.
It has asked representatives of the Taliban to match that confidence-building measure with some of their own. Those could include a denunciation of international terrorism and a public willingness to enter formal political talks
Guantanamo detainees have been released to foreign governments - and sometimes set free by them - before. But the transfer as part of a diplomatic negotiation appears unprecedented.

"The challenges are enormous," a second senior U.S. official acknowledged. "But if you're where we are ... you can't not try. You have to find out what's out there."Those are not exactly the most confidence-inspiring words to come from a senior U.S. official. We'll just release some terrorists and see what happens. WHAT COULD POSSIBLY GO WRONG??
But, America, Reuters assures us that we can feel safe at night (and on airplanes) because there are slightly fewer that 20 Afghan citizens at Guantanamo... Fewer than 20 terrorists; where have I heard that number before?
Ten years after the repressive Taliban government was toppled, a hoped-for political resolution has become central to U.S. strategy to end a war that has killed nearly 3,000 foreign troops and cost the Pentagon alone $330 billion.How about this, Obama: Hey, Taliban, we will stop killing you if you stop blowing up innocent people. If the Taliban are suffering declining militant attacks and a thinning of the Taliban's mid-level leadership, the US should be in a position of power and should dictate terms and not bow to long-standing demands of the waning enemy.
After all, the Taliban apparently no longer wants to be seen as a bad bunch of guys:
U.S. officials say the Taliban no longer wants to be the global pariah it was in the 1990s

But, we'll just take them at their word, because renouncing violence, breaking with al Qaeda, and respecting the Afghan constitution - are not preconditions to starting talks. Why would the "repressive" Taliban lie?
At least one purported insurgent representative has turned out to be a fraud... (Afghan President Hamid Karzai) counseled caution in making sure that Taliban interlocutors are authentic -- and authentically seeking peace. The killing (of former Afghan President Burhanuddin Rabbani*), he said, "brought us in a shock to the recognition that we were actually talking to nobody..."Yet as it moves ahead the peace initiative is fraught with challenge, Reuters explains. Gee, do ya think so? But, hey, you can't not try, right?
"There's a very real likelihood that these guys aren't serious ... " the third senior U.S. official said.
*Earlier this year, Burhanuddin Rabbani, who led the Afghan High Peace Council, was assassinated by a suicide bomber claiming to represent Mullah Omar's Quetta Shura Taliban.
No comments:
Post a Comment